You may recall that the 722 had this thing where the blade felt like it could move upward slightly when open. I saw where someone said that it's really the handle that is moving if you want to look at it light that. So I did look at it like that. And it's true. The blade does not move in any way against the lock bar. The 726 does the same thing, but in fact the "lockup" is actually very strong. Like before, opening is smooth, thought not as smooth as my example of the 722. Like every other Buck I've purchased it came razor sharp. To appease anyone who considers cutting cardboard and paper an exercise in knife testing I split up a bit of fine Red Elm kindling tonight to get my wood stove going. I used a twisting motion to split already finely split pieces into finer pieces still, and what do you know, the Mini did great. Let's do the picture thing.
|BOOM! Green this time.|
|Blade centering seems to be important to people and it's good but what's more is the blade is stuffed in there keeping things as slim as possible.|
|The 726 Mini Spitfire is slimmer than its sibling - Mini in every dimension.|
|Some idea of the size of the Mini in hand.|
|Here, and I don't think I captured it very well, it appears as though the blade jimping is a little wonky - deeper to one side.|
|This shows the jimping a bit more clearly.|
|Couple of Ka-Bar Folding Hunters joined the gang recently as well. They aren't large folders at all but a bit bigger than the 722 Mini Spitfire.|
|Once again it looks like that nice polish helps keep the Spitfire running smooth.|
|I dug around and found a better shot of the finish work. You can see grind lines running parallel on one side, perpendicular on the other and it's particularly uneven in this area.|
So what's the deal on the fit and finish? I know I'm being picky. I actually paid a few dollars more for the mini than I did the 722 which was partly my own fault, but urges me to be a little more critical. The 722 Spitfire actually shares many of the same "issues" that the Mini has but they are more minor. For instance, there might be a touch here or there where things aren't even on the 722, but barely. The jimping is maybe a little off let's say, but it's just a little more off on the Mini. As for the extra grinding, maybe it was intentional, and maybe the idea was to soften the feel just a little, but it looks unfinished. The marks left from whatever tool they used to accomplish it are errant and uneven. The backspacer doesn't look as well fit and the rounding creates gaps that give an overall less than precise fit. Are the workers pushing to get POs filled? Will things look a little neater in a few months time? Hard to say. The 722 Spitfire set the bar with good to excellent fit and finish and in that arena when paying roughly the same money, it's hard not to knock the Mini. And the 722 got away with not having amazing fit and finish because of the price point. With that said, everything else about the Mini is on par with the 722 and it is still hard to argue with those looks, great design, and a long list of features.
As a final thought, if Buck is taking suggestions, I really like what I'm seeing on the Rush. I think the Rush is weird looking myself, but I dig the new matte finished anodizing and I think the Spitfire is the first place I would expand that offering. Of course I got the gray versions. I like the clean look for the most part, but I really dig that splash of personality hiding there at the backspacer as well. Overall though, I'm not really into the loud colors myself. The Rush colors are more subtle and while they are kind of limited right now, I envision an opportunity to do something unique like bronze or warm gray with a faded rusty red accent. I can understand sticking to the bright orange or green, or the basic colors of the rainbow, but I think there is room for something that has basically not been seen on production knives.